Πληροφορίες

Τετάρτη 23 Ιανουαρίου 2013

Cannabis and Cannabinoids

Cannabis and Cannabinoids

This article is a mirror of this page on the website of the National Cancer Institute.
General Information
Story
Laboratory / Animal / Preclinical Studies
Antitumor Effects
appetite stimulation
Analgesia
Human / Clinical Studies
Cannabis Pharmacology
        cancer risk
Cancer Treatment
antiemetic effect
        Cannabinoids
        Cannabis
appetite stimulation
        Cannabinoids
        Cannabis
Analgesia
        Cannabinoids
        Cannabis
Stress and sleep
        Cannabis
Side Effects
Cannabinoids
Cannabis
Overall Level of evidence for Cannabis and Cannabinoids
Changes to This Summary (03/28/2011)
More information
In this Summary PDQ
Survey
This complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) information summary provides an overview of the use of cannabis and its constituents as a treatment for people with cancer-related symptoms caused by the disease itself or its treatment.
This summary contains the following key elements:
Cannabis has been used for medicinal purposes for thousands of years before the current status as an illegal substance.
Chemical components of cannabis, called cannabinoid energopoiouneidika receptors are found throughout the body to produce pharmacological effects, particularly central nervous system and toanosopoiitiko system.
Cannabinoids may have benefits in the treatment of cancer-related side effects.
Many of the medical and scientific terms used in this summary are hypertext linked (at first use in each section) to the Terms toLexiko NCI Cancer 1, which is oriented towards nonexperts.Otan a term that is clicked, a definition will appear in separate parathyro.Ola related terms and their corresponding definitions will appear in a glossary in the printed version of the summary.
Reference citations in some PDQ CAM information summaries may include links to external websites operated by individuals or organizations for marketing or support the use of specific products or treatments. These references are included for reference and informational purposes only. Their inclusion should not be regarded as an indication of the content of websites, or of any treatment or product, by the Board Cancer PDQ CAM Editor or the National Cancer Institute.
General Information
Cannabis, also known as marijuana, originated in Central Asia but is grown worldwide today. In the United States, is a controlled substance and is classified as a Schedule I agent (enafarmako with increased potential for abuse and no known medical use). Ikannavi plant produces a resin containing psychoactive compounds called cannabinoids. The highest concentration of cannabinoid is in female flowers of the plant. [1] In botany, cannabis is difficult to study because of the lack of standardization of herbal products because of the many climates and environments in which it is grown. Clinical trials conducted on medicinal Cannabis are limited. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved the use of cannabis as a treatment for any medical condition. To conduct clinical drug research in the United States, researchers must file Investigational New Drug (IND) application with the FDA.
The potential benefits of medicinal Cannabis for people living mekarkino include antiemetic effects, appetite stimulation, pain relief, and improved sleep. Though no relevant surveys of practice patterns, it appears that physicians caring for cancer patients who prescribe medicinal cannabis do mainly for the management of symptoms.
Cannabinoids are a group of compounds found terpenophenolic stinkannavi species (Cannabis sativa L. and Cannabis indica Lam.). This summary will review the role of cannabis and cannabinoids in the treatment of people with cancer and diseases associated with or related to therapeiaanepithymites actions.
References
L. Adams, Martin BR: Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans. Addiction 91 (11): 1585-614, 1996.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]


Story
Cannabis use for medicinal purposes dates back at least 3,000 years [.1 - 5] was introduced into Western medicine in the 1840s by WB O'Shaughnessy, a surgeon who learned of its medicinal properties while working in India for the British Society East India. The use of promoted for reported analgesic, sedative, anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic and anticonvulsant effects.
In 1937, the U.S. Treasury introduced the Tax Act Marihuana. This Act imposed a levy of one U.S. dollar an ounce for medicinal use of cannabis and one hundred U.S. dollars an ounce for recreational use. Giatroistis the United States were the main opponents of the law. The American Medical Association (AMA) opposed the act because physicians were required to pay a special tax for prescribing Cannabis, use special forms to obtain and keep a separate record of professional chrisi.Epipleon, AMA believed that there is objective evidence that cannabis was addictive was lacking and that passage of the law would prevent further research on medicinal value. [6] In 1942, cannabis was removed from IPAFarmakopoiias because of persistent concerns about its potential to cause harm. [2, 3]
In 1951, Congress passed the Act Boggs, which for the first time, included Cannabis with narcotic drugs. In 1970, with the enactment of the Law on pesticides, marijuana is classified as Annex I of drugs. Drugs of this class are distinguished as having no accepted medical use. Other Annex I substances include heroin, LSD, mescaline, methaqualone, and gamma-hydroxybutyrate.
Despite its name as it has no medical use, cannabis was distributed to patients by the U.S. government on a case-by tinparigoritiki use Investigational New Drug program established in 1978.Dianomi Cannabis through this program was discontinued in 1992 [. 1 to 4] In 2010, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs approved the use of marijuana for patients in countries where medical use is legal.
The main psychoactive ingredient of cannabis was identified as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). In 1986, synthetic delta-9-THC in sesame oil was licensed and approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-associated nausea kaiemeto under the generic name dronabinol. Clinical trials determined that dronabinol was as effective as or better than other antiemetikonparagonton. [7] Dronabinol has also been studied for its ability to stimulate weight gain in patients with AIDS at the end of 1980. Clinical trial results showed no significant weight gain, although patients reported improvement in appetite. [8, 9]
Over the last 20 years, the neurobiology of cannabinoids has been analyzed [.10 - 13] The first cannabinoid receptor, CB1, was pharmacologically identified in the brain in 1988. A second cannabinoid receptor, CB2, was identified in 1993. The higher concentration of receptor CB2 is BSE lymphocytes and natural killer cells, suggesting a possible role in immunity. Endogenous cannabinoids have (endocannabinoids) have been identified and appear to have a role in regulating pain management, control of movement, feeding behavior, and memory. [11]
References
Abel EL: Marihuana, the first twelve thousand years. New York: Plenum Press, 1980. Also available online 2. Last accessed on March 17 2011.Ê
Joy JE, Watson SJ, Benson JA, eds:. Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base. Washington, DC:. National Academy Press, 1999 Also available online 3. Last accessed on March 17 2011.Ê
Mack A, J Joy: Marijuana as medicine? Science Beyond the controversy. Washington, DC:. National Academy Press, 2001 Also available online 4. Last accessed on March 17 2011.Ê
Booth M: Cannabis: A History. New York, New York: ST Martin, 2003.Ê
Russo EB, Jiang HE, Li X, et al:. Phytochemical and genetic analyzes of ancient cannabis from Central Asia. J Exp Bot 59 (15): 4171-82, 2008.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Schaffer Library of Drug Policy:. The Marihuana Tax Act of 1937: Taxation of Marihuana. Washington, DC: House of Representatives, Committee on ways and means of 1937.Diathesimo online 5. Last accessed on March 17 2011.Ê
Sallan SE, Zinberg NE, Frei E 3rd: Antiemetic effect of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 293 (16): 795-7, 1975.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Gorter R, Seefried M, Volberding P: Dronabinol effects on weight in patients infected with HIV. AIDS 6 (1): 127, 1992.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Beal JE, Olson R, Laubenstein L, et al:. Dronabinol as a treatment for anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with AIDS. J Pain Symptom Manage 10 (2): 89-97, 1995.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Devane WA, Dysarz FA third, Johnson MR, et al:. Identification and characterization of a cannabinoid receptor in rat brain. Mol Pharmacol 34 (5): 605-13, 1988.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Devane WA, Hanus L, Breuer A, et al:. Isolation and structure of an element of the brain associated with cannabinoid receptors. Science 258 (5090): 1946-9, 1992.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Pertwee RG: Pharmacology of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2. There Pharmacol 74 (2): 129-80, 1997.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Felder CC, Glass M: cannabinoid receptors and endogenous agonists tous.Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 38: 179-200, 1998.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]


Laboratory / Animal / Preclinical Studies
Cannabinoids are a group of 21 terpenophenolic carbon compounds produced exclusively from cannabis sativa and Cannabis indica species. [1, 2] These plant compounds may be referred to as phytocannabinoids. While delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the principal psychoactive ingredient, other known compounds having biological activity is kannavinoli, cannabidiol, cannabichromene, cannabigerol, tetrahydrocannabivirin, and delta-8-THC.Kannavidiolis, specifically, is believed to have significant analgesic and anti -inflammatory activity without the psychoactive effect (high) of delta-9-THC.
Results against ogkouMia study in mice and rats suggested that cannabinoids may have a protective effect against the development of certain types of tumors. [3] During this 2-year study, groups of mice and rats administered various doses of THC by gavage. A dose dependent reduction in the incidence of hepatic adenoma tumors and hepatocellular carcinoma was seen in mice. Reduced cases of benign tumors (polyps and adenomas) in other organs (mammary gland, uterus, pituitary, testis, and pancreas) were also observed in rats. In another study, delta-9-THC, delta-8-THC, cannabinol, and found to inhibit the growth of Lewis lung adenocarcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. [4] In addition, other tumors have been shown to be sensitive to cannabinoid-induced growth inhibition [. 5 to 8]
Cannabinoids may cause antitumor effects by various mechanisms, including the induction of cell death, inhibition of cell growth, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and tismetastasis. [9 - 11], cannabinoids appear to kill tumor cells, but do not affect non-transformed counterparts and may even protect from cell death. These compounds have been shown to induce apoptosis in glioma cells in culture and induce ypochorisiton glioma tumors in mice and rats. Cannabinoids protect normal glial cells of astroglial and oligodendroglial lineages from apoptosis mediated by the CB1 receptor. [10, 11]
In an in vivo model using severe combined immunodeficient mice, subcutaneous tumors were generated by inoculating the animals with cells from human non-small cell lung carcinoma cell lines. [12] The tumor growth was inhibited by 60% in THC-treated mice compared to vehicle-treated control mice. Tumor specimens revealed that THC had antiangiogenic and antiproliferative effects.
Moreover, both of vegetable origin and endogenous cannabinoids have been studied for anti-inflammatory effects. One study showed that mouse endogenous cannabinoid system signaling is likely to provide intrinsic protection against colonic inflammation. [13] As a result, a case phytocannabinoids endocannabinoids and may be useful in the treatment of prolipsikai colon cancer has developed. [14]
Another study has shown delta-9-THC is a potent and selective ionparagonta by Kaposi's sarcoma-related herpesvirus (KSHV), also known as human herpesvirus 8. [15] The researchers concluded that additional studies are warranted to cannabinoids and herpesviruses, as they can lead to the development of drugs that inhibit the reactivation of these oncogenic viruses. Subsequently, another group of researchers reported increased efficiency of KSHV infection of human dermal microvascular epithelial cells in the presence of low doses of delta-9-THC. [16]
Stimulation of orexisPolles animal studies have previously shown that the delta-9-THC and other cannabinoids have a stimulatory effect on appetite and increase feed intake. Believed that the endogenous cannabinoid system can serve as a regulator of feeding behavior. The endogenous cannabinoid anandamide potently enhances appetite in mice. [17] In addition, CB1ypodocheis the hypothalamus may be involved in motivation or reward aspects of eating. [18]
AnalgisiaTin understanding of the mechanism of cannabinoid-induced analgesia has been increased through the study of cannabinoid receptors, endocannabinoids kaisynthetikon agonists and antagonists. The CB1 receptor is both stokentriko nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nerve terminals. Similar meopioeidon receptors, increased levels of CB1 receptors found in the brain that regulate nociceptive processing. [19] CB2 receptors are located primarily in peripheral tissue, present in very low levels in the CNS. With the development of receptor-specific antagonists, additional information about the roles of the receptors and endogenous cannabinoids in the regulation of pain has been obtained. [20, 21]
Cannabinoids can also contribute to the modulation of pain through an anti-inflammatory mechanism; A cannabinoid CB2 effect acting giaistiokyttaro receptors weaken the release of inflammatory factors, such as histamine and serotonin, and on keratinocytes to enhance the release of analgesic opioids is described [. 22 to 24]
References
L. Adams, Martin BR: Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans. Addiction 91 (11): 1585-614, 1996.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Grotenhermen F, E Russo, eds:. Cannabis and Cannabinoids: Pharmacology, Toxicology, and therapeutic potential. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, 2002.Ê
National Toxicology Program:. NTP Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 1-Trans-Delta (9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (No. CAS 03/08/1972) F344 rats and mice B6C3F1 (Ypersitisiiou Studies). Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser 446 (): 1-317, 1996.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Bifulco M, Laezza C, Pisanti S, et al:. Cannabinoids and cancer: pros and cons of an antitumour strategy. Br J Pharmacol 148 (2): 123-35, 2006.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
S ‡ nchez C, de Ceballos ML, Gomez del Pulgar T, et al:. Inhibition of growth of glioma in vivo by selective activation of CB (2) cannabinoid receptor. Cancer Res 61 (15): 5784-9, 2001.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
McKallip RJ, Lombard C, Fisher M, et al:. Targeting CB2 cannabinoid receptors as a novel therapy to treat malignant lymphoblastic disease. Blood 100 (2): 627-34, 2002.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Casanova ML, Bl ‡ zquez C, Mart'nez-Palacio J, et al:. Inhibition of tumor growth of the skin and angiogenesis in vivo by activation of cannabinoid receptors. J Clin Invest 111 (1): 43-50, 2003.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Bl ‡ zquez C, GONZ ‡ lez-Feria L, Alvarez L, et al:. Cannabinoids inhibit the pathway of vascular endothelial growth factor in gloiomata.Cancer Res 64 (16): 5617-23, 2004.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Guzm ‡ n M: Cannabinoids: potential anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer 3 (10): 745-55, 2003.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Bl ‡ zquez C, Casanova ML, Planas A, et al:. Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis of cannabinoids. FASEB J 17 (3): 529-31, 2003.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Vaccani A, Massi P, Colombo A, et al:. Cannabidiol inhibits human glioma cell migration through a cannabinoid receptor independent mechanism. Br J Pharmacol 144 (8): 1032-6, 2005.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Preet A, Ganju RK, Groopman JE: Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol inhibits epithelial growth factor-induced lung cancer cell migration in vitro, and the growth and metastasis in vivo. Oncogene 27 (3): 339-46, 2008.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Massa F, G Marsicano, Hermann H, et al:. The endogenous cannabinoid system protects against colonic inflammation. J Clin Invest 113 (8): 1202-9, 2004.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Patsos HA, DJ Hicks, Greenhough A, et al:. Cannabinoids and cancer: potential for the treatment of colon. Biochem Soc Trans 33 (Pt 4): 712-4, 2005.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Medveczky MM, Sherwood TA, Klein TW, et al:. Delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) inhibits lytic replication of gamma oncogenic herpesviruses in vitro.BMC Med 2: 34, 2004.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Zhang X, Wang JF, Kunos G, et al:. Cannabinoids differentiation sarcoma-Kaposi, associated herpesvirus infection and transformation. Cancer Res 67 (15): 7230-7, 2007.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
. Mechoulam R, Berry EM, Avraham Y, et al: endocannabinoids, nutrition and breastfeeding - from our side. Int J Obes (Lond) 30 (Suppl 1): S24-8, 2006.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Fride E, Bregman T, Kirkham TC: endocannabinoids and food intake: newborn suckling and appetite regulation in adulthood. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 230 (4): 225-34, 2005.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Walker JM, Hohmann AG, Martin WJ et al,. The neurobiology of cannabinoid analgesia. Life Sci 65 (6-7): 665-73, 1999.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Meng ID, BH Manning, Martin WJ et al,. Analgesia A circuit activated by cannabinoids. Nature 395 (6700): 381-3, 1998.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Walker JM, Huang SM, NM Strangman, et al:. Modulation of pain through the release of endogenous cannabinoid anandamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96 (21): 12198-203, 1999.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Facci L, Dal Toso R, Romanello S, et al:. Mast cells express a peripheral cannabinoid receptor with differential sensitivity to anandamide and palmitoulaithanolamidio. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92 (8): 3376-80, 1995.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Ibrahim MM, Porreca F, Lai J, et al:. CB2 receptor activation of cannabinoid produce perception of pain by stimulating peripheral release of endogenous opioids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (8): 3093-8, 2005.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Richardson JD, S kilo, Hargreaves KM: Cannabinoids reduce hyperalgesia and inflammation via interaction with peripheral receptors CB1. Pain 75 (1): 111-9, 1998.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]


Human / Clinical Studies

Cannabis FarmakologiasOtan hemp was ingested by mouth, there is a low (6% D20%) and variable oral bioavailability. [1, 2] Maximum plasmasygkentroseis of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) occur after 1 to 6 hours and remain elevated with a half-life of 20 to 30 ores.Lamvanetai oral delta-9-THC is initially metabolized in liver to 11-OH-THC, a potent psychoactive metabolite. When inhaled, cannabinoids rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream, with a peak concentration of 2 to 10 minutes, rapidly decreases for a period of 30 minutes and less production of psychoactive 11-OH metabolite.
Cannabinoids are known to interact with the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme. [3, 4] In one study, 24 cancer patients treated with intravenous irinotecan (600 mg, n = 12) or docetaxel followed (180 mg, n = 12), 3 weeks later, the same drugs concomitant with medicinal cannabis taken in the form of herbal tea for 15 consecutive days, starting 12 days before the second treatment. [4] The administration tisKannavis not significantly affect the exposure and clearance of irinotecan or docetaxel, while the route of administration herbal tea can not reproduce the effects of inhalation or oral ingestion of fat-dialytakannavinoeidi.
The risk karkinouMia number of studies have provided conflicting evidence on the risks of various cancers associated with cannabis use. A case-study group of men in northwestern Africa showed a significantly increased risk of lung cancer among tobacco smokers who also inhaled cannabis. A large retrospective cohort study from the United States found that Cannabis use was not associated with tobacco-related cancers and a host of other common malignancies, but found that among non-smokers from tobacco smoke, have never used kannavisyschetistike with increased risk of prostate cancer. [5] A plithysmiakimeleti-control of the association between cannabis use and risk toupnefmona and respiratory tract cancer in Los Angeles found no positive correlation with any type of cancer (mouth, pharynx, larynx, lung, or esophagus) when adjusting for various confounding factors such as cigarette smoking [. 6] A comprehensive Health Canada monograph on Marihuana (Marijuana, Cannabis): Information for Healthcare Professionals concludes that while there are many cellular and molecular studies provide strong evidence that inhaled marijuana is carcinogenic, the epidemiologic evidence of a link between of marijuana use and cancer is still unclear. [7]
Treatment karkinouDen no clinical trials of cannabis as a treatment for cancer in humans were identified in a search PubMed.
Antiemetic effect

KannavinoeidiPara advances in pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management, nausea kaiemeto (N / V) remain distressing side effects for cancer patients and their families. Dronabinol was approved in the United States in 1986 osantiemetiko for use in cancer chemotherapy. Nabilone, one allosynthetiko form of delta-9-THC, was first approved in Canada in 1982 and is now available in the United States. [8] Both dronabinol nabilone and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of N / V associated with cancer chemotherapy in patients who have failed to respond to conventional antiemetic. Polyarithmesklinikes treatment trials and meta-analyzes have shown that dronabinol and nabilone are effective in the treatment of N / V chemotherapy induced [. 9 -12]
One systematic review studied 30 randomized comparisons of delta-9-THC preparations with placebo or other antiemetics from which data on the efficacy and harm were available. [13] Oral nabilone, oral dronabinol, and intramuscular levonantradol (a synthetic analog of dronabinol) tested. Inhaled Cannabis trials were not included. Among all 1366 patients included in the review, cannabinoids found to be more effective than the conventional antiemetic prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, chlorpromazine, triaithyloperazini, haloperidol, domperidone, and alizapride. Cannabinoids, however, was more effective in patients receiving very low or very high emetogenic chemotherapy. Side effects include a sense of being high, euphoria, sedation or somnolence, dizziness, malaise or depression, hallucinations, paranoia, and hypotension. [13]
Another analysis of 15 controlled studies compared nabilone with placebo or available antiemetic drugs. [14] Among 600 patients with cancer, nabilone found to be superior to prochlorperazine, domperidone, and alizapride, with nabilone favored for continuous use.
KannaviTreis studies have evaluated the efficacy of inhaled marijuana in chemotherapy-induced N / V. [15 to 17] In two studies, inhaled Cannabis was made available only after dronabinol failure. In the first trial, no antiemetic effect was achieved with marijuana in patients receiving cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin, [15] but in the second test, enastatistika significant antiemetic effect was higher among patients receiving high-dose methotrexate compared with those who received placebo. [16] The third study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study involving 20 adults in which both inhaled and oral THC marijuana evaluated. A quarter of patients reported a positive response to the cannabinoid antiemetic treatments. This latter study reported in abstract form in 1984. A full report detailing the methods and results apparently unpublished, which limits a thorough interpretation of the significance of these findings. [17]
OrexisAnorexia stimulation, early satiety, weight loss and cachexia are problems experienced by patients with cancer. These patients face not only the deformation associated with waste, and the inability to participate in social interaction meals.
KannavinoeidiDyo controlled trials showed that oral THC has variable effects on appetite stimulation and weight loss in patients with advanced malignancies Kull human immunodeficiency (HIV) infection. [14] A study evaluated whether dronabinol alone or with megestrol acetate was higher, lower, or equal in activity to megestrol acetate only to the management of cancer related anorexia. [18] In this randomized double-blind study of 469 adults with advanced cancer and weight loss, patients received 2,5 mg orally twice daily THC, 800 mg orally daily megestrol, or both . Appetite increased by 75% in the megestrol and weight increased by 11%, compared to a 49% increase in appetite and a 3% increase in weight at the oral THC group. These two differences were statistically significant. Furthermore, the combination therapy did not provide additional benefits beyond those provided by megestrol acetate only. The authors concluded that dronabinol did little to promote appetite or weight gain in patients with advanced cancer compared with megestrol acetate. However, a smaller placebo-controlled trial dronabinol in cancer patients demonstrated improved and enhanced chemosensory perception in the cannabinoid groupÑfood better taste, increased appetite, and the proportion of calories consumed as protein was greater than in placebo recipients. [19]
Another clinical trial involving 139 patients with HIV or AIDS, and weight loss was found that, compared to placebo, oral dronabinol was associated with a statistically significant increase in appetite after 4 to 6 weeks. Patients receiving dronabinol tended to stabilize the weight, while patients receiving placebo continued to lose weight. [20]
KannaviAnecdotally in trials conducted in the 1970's involved healthy control subjects, inhaling Cannabis led to an increase tisthermidikis recruitment, mainly in the form of between meals, with increased intake of fatty and sugary foods. No published studies have investigated the effect of inhaled cannabis on appetite in patients with cancer.
Analgesia

KannavinoeidiI pain management improves a patient's quality of life at all stadiatou cancer. Through the study of cannabinoid receptors, endocannabinoids, and synthetic agonists and antagonists, the mechanisms of cannabinoid-induced analgesia have been analyzed. The CB1 receptor is in the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nerve terminals. [21] The CB2 receptors are located primarily in peripheral tissues and expressed only in small amounts in the CNS. While only CB1 agonists exert analgesic activity in the CNS, both CB1 and CB2 agonists have analgesic activity in peripheral tissue. [22, 23]
Cancer pain results from inflammation, invasion of bone or other pain-sensitive structures, or nerve damage. When cancer pain is severe and persistent, are often resistant to treatment with opioids.
Two studies examined the effects of oral delta-9-THC with the threat of cancer. The first, a double-blind controlled study involving ten patients, measured as the intensity of pain and to relieve pain. [24] reported that 15 mg and 20 mg doses of cannabinoid delta-9-THC were associated with significant analgesic effects, with antiemetic effects and appetite stimulation.
In a single dose study was then comprising 36 patients, it was reported that 10 mg doses of delta-9-THC produced analgesic effects during a 7-hour observation period were comparable to 60 mg doses of codeine, and 20 mg doses of delta-9-THC induced effects equivalent to 120 mg doses of codeine. [25] Higher doses of THC were found to be more sedative than codeine.
Another study examined the effects of whole-plant extract with controlled cannabinoid content in oral sprays. In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, THC: cannabidiol (THC: CBD) extract and THC extract alone in analgesic management of patients with advanced cancer and moderate to severe cancer-related pain. The patients were divided into one of three treatment groups: THC: CBD extract, THC, or placebo. The researchers concluded that the THC:. CBD extract was effective in relieving pain in patients with advanced cancer whose pain is not fully relieved by strong opioids [26]
An observational study evaluated the efficacy of nabilone in patients with advanced cancer who experience pain and allasymptomata (anorexia, depression, and anxiety). The researchers reported that patients who used nabilone experienced improved management of pain, nausea, anxiety and distress compared with untreated patients. Nabilone was also associated with reduced use of opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, dexamethasone, metoclopramide, kaiondansetroni. [27]
KannaviO Neuropathic pain is a symptom of cancer patients may experience, especially if treated with platinum-based chemotherapy itaxanes. A randomized controlled trial of inhaled Cannabis compared with placebo in 50 patients with HIV-related peripheral neuropathy found that pain was reduced by more than 30% to 52% of patients in the cannabis group and in 24% of patients in group placebo. This difference was statistically significant. [28] To date, no clinical trial has examined the effectiveness of cannabinoid preparations in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain.
Stress and sleep

KannaviOi patients often experience mood elevation after exposure to Cannabis, depending on their previous experience. In five patient case series of inhaled marijuana that examined the analgesic effects of THC, reported that patients administered THC had improved mood, improved sense of well-being, and less anxiety. [29]
Another common effect of cannabis is drowsiness. In a study of a sublingual spray, a cannabis-based mixture was able to improve the quality of sleep. [30] A small placebo-controlled study of dronabinol in cancer patients with altered chemosensory perception also improved the quality of sleep and relaxation in THC-treated patients. [19]
References
L. Adams, Martin BR: Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans. Addiction 91 (11): 1585-614, 1996.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Agurell S, M Halldin, Lindgren JE, et al:. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of delta 1-tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids with emphasis on man. Pharmacol Rev 38 (1): 21-43, 1986.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Yamamoto I, Watanabe K, Narimatsu S, et al:. Recent advances in the metabolism of cannabinoids. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 27 (8): 741-6, 1995.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Watanabe T, T Matsunaga, Yamamoto I, et al:. Involvement of CYP2C in the metabolism of cannabinoids by human hepatic microsomes from an old woman. Biol Pharm Bull 18 (8): 1138-41, 1995.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Sidney S, Quesenberry CP Jr, GD Friedman, et al:. Marijuana use and cancer incidence (California, United States). Cancer Causes Control 8 (5): 722-8, 1997.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Hashibe M, H Morgenstern, Cui Y, et al:. Marijuana use and the risk of lung and upper aerodigestive tract cancers: results of a population-based case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 (10): 1829-34, 2006.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Health Canada:. Marihuana (Marijuana, Cannabis): Dried Plant for Administration by ingestion or by other means. Ottawa, Canada: Health Canada, 2010. Available online 6. Last accessed on March 17 2011.Ê
Sutton IR, Daeninck P: Cannabinoids in the management of intractable chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and cancer-related pain. J Support Oncol 4 (10): 531-5, 2006 Nov-Dec.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Ahmedzai S, Carlyle DL, Calder IT, et al:. Antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of nabilone, a synthetic cannabinoid, in chemotherapy for lung cancer. Br J Cancer 48 (5): 657-63, 1983.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Chan HS, Correia JA, MacLeod SM: Nabilone versus prochlorperazine for control of cancer chemotherapy-induced emesis in children: a double-blind, crossover trial. Pediatrics 79 (6): 946-52, 1987.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Beal JE, Olson R, Laubenstein L, et al:. Dronabinol as a treatment for anorexia associated with weight loss in patients with AIDS. J Pain Symptom Manage 10 (2): 89-97, 1995.Ê [PUBMED Abstract
References
L. Adams, Martin BR: Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans. Addiction 91 (11): 1585-614, 1996.Ê [PUBMED Abstract]
Grotenhermen F, E Russo, eds:. Cannabis and Cannabinoids: Pharmacology, Toxicology, and therapeutic potential. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, 2002.Ê
Guzm ‡ n M: Cannabinoids: potential anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer 3 (10): 745-55, 2003.Ê [PUBMED Abstract
Overall Level of evidence for Cannabis and Cannabinoids
Cannabinoids
Changes to This Summary (03/28/2011)

Cannabidiol as a novel inhibitor of Id-1 gene expression in aggressive breast cancer cells


Cannabidiol as a novel inhibitor of Id-1 gene expressionin aggressive breast cancer cells

Sean D. McAllister, Rigel T. Christian,
Maxx P. Horowitz, Amaia Garcia,
and Pierre-Yves Desprez
California Pacific Medical Center, Research Institute,
San Francisco, California
Abstract
Invasion and metastasis of aggressive breast cancer cells
is the final and fatal step during cancer progression, and
is the least understood genetically. Clinically, there are still
limited therapeutic interventions for aggressive and metastatic breast cancers available. Clearly, effective and nontoxic therapies are urgently required. Id-1, an inhibitor of
basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, has recently
been shown to be a key regulator of the metastatic
potential of breast and additional cancers. Using a mouse
model, we previously determined that metastatic breast
cancer cells became significantly less invasive in vitro and
less metastatic in vivo when Id-1 was down-regulated by
stable transduction with antisense Id-1. It is not possible
at this point, however, to use antisense technology to
reduce Id-1 expression in patients with metastatic breast
cancer. Here, we report that cannabidiol (CBD), a cannabinoid with a low-toxicity profile, could down-regulate
Id-1 expression in aggressive human breast cancer cells.
The CBD concentrations effective at inhibiting Id-1 expression correlated with those used to inhibit the proliferative
and invasive phenotype of breast cancer cells. CBD was
able to inhibit Id-1 expression at the mRNA and protein
level in a concentration-dependent fashion. These effects
seemed to occur as the result of an inhibition of the
Id-1 gene at the promoter level. Importantly, CBD did
not inhibit invasiveness in cells that ectopically expressed
Id-1. In conclusion, CBD represents the first nontoxic
exogenous agent that can significantly decrease Id-1
expression in metastatic breast cancer cells leading to the
down-regulation of tumor aggressiveness. [Mol Cancer
Ther 2007;6(11):2921–7]
Introduction
The development of breast cancer and its spread to other
parts of the body requires several genotypic and phenotypic changes in the cells leading to de-differentiation,
uncontrolled proliferation, and invasion. Invasion and
metastasis to the other tissues of the body is the final and
fatal step during cancer progression and is the least
understood genetically (1). Despite all currently available
treatments, breast cancer is most often incurable once
clinically apparent metastases develops.
Id helix-loop-helix proteins are negative regulators of
basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors (2). Strong evidence now suggests that the Id family of helix-loop-helix
proteins control cellular processes related to tumor progression (3). We found that reducing Id-1 using antisense
technology led to significant reductions in breast cancer
cell proliferation and invasiveness in vitro and metastasis
in vivo in mice (4). Furthermore, Id-1 overexpression in
breast cancer cells was also found to be one of the most
significant genes within a gene signature set that is correlated with the propensity of primary human breast cancer cells to metastasize to the lung (5).
Reducing Id-1 expression could provide a rational
therapeutic strategy for the treatment of aggressive human
breast cancers. It is not possible at this point, however,
to use antisense technology to reduce Id-1 expression in
humans with metastatic breast cancer. In our search for a
nontoxic exogenous compound that could inhibit Id-1 expression, a potential candidate agent, cannabidiol (CBD),
was discovered.
The endocannabinoid system was discovered through
research focusing on the primary psychoactive component
of Cannabis sativa, D
9
-tetrahydrocannabinol (D
9
-THC), and
other synthetic cannabinoids (6). D
9
-THC and additional
cannabinoid agonists have been shown to interact with two
G protein – coupled receptors named CB1 and CB2 (6). More
recent studies have shown that CB1 and CB2 receptor
agonists show promise as tumor inhibitors (7, 8). The
psychotropic effects of D
9
-THC and additional cannabinoid
agonists, mediated through the CB1
receptor, limit their
clinical utility. In addition to D
9
-THC, CBD is also present
in significant quantities in C. sativa (9). CBD does not have
appreciable affinity for CB1 or CB2 receptors and does not
have psychotropic activities (10). CBD has been shown to
inhibit breast cancer metastasis in vivo in mice (11).
However, modulation of a distinct signaling pathway that
would explain the inhibitory action of CBD on breast
cancer metastasis has not been elucidated.
Received 6/4/07; revised 9/5/07; accepted 9/20/07.
Grant support: NIH (CA102412, CA111723, DA09978, and CA82548),
the Department of Defense (PC041013), the California Breast Cancer
Research Program (12IB-0116), and the Research Institute at California
Pacific Medical Center.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
advertisement in accordance with 18U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to
indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Sean D. McAllister, California Pacific Medical
Center, Research Institute, 475 Brannan Street, San Francisco, CA
94107. Phone: 415-600-5926; Fax: 415-600-1725.
E-mail: mcallis@cpmcri.org
Copyright C 2007 American Association for Cancer Research.
doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0371
2921
Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(11). November 2007Our data presented here show that CBD represents the
first exogenous agent that can down-regulate Id-1 expression in aggressive hormone-independent breast cancer
cells. We suggest that CBD down-regulation of Id-1 and
corresponding inhibition of human breast cancer cell
proliferation and invasiveness provides a potential mechanism for the antimetastatic activity of the compound.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture and Treatments
We used the human breast cancer cells lines MDA-MB231
and MDA-MB436 obtained from American Type Culture
Collection. To prepare the MDA-MB231-Id-1 cells, cells
were infected with a pLXSN-Id-1 sense expression vector.
In all experiments, the different cell populations were first
cultured in RPMI medium containing 10% fetal bovine
serum. On the first day of treatment, the medium was
replaced with vehicle control or drug in RPMI and 0.1%
fetal bovine serum as previously reported (12). The media
with the appropriate compounds were replaced every 24 h.
D
9
-THC, CBN, CBD, CBG, and CP55,940 were obtained
from the NIH through the National Institute of Drug
Abuse. WIN55,212-2 was purchased from Sigma-RBI.
MTT Assay
To quantify cell proliferation, the MTT assay was used
(Chemicon). Cells were seeded in 96-well plates. Upon
completion of the drug treatments, cells were incubated at
37jC with MTT for 4 h, and then isopropanol with 0.04 N
HCl was added and the absorbance was read after 1 h in
a plate reader with a test wavelength of 570 nm. The
absorbance of the medium alone at 570 nm was subtracted,
and percentage control was calculated as the absorbance
of the treated cells/control cells 100.
Boyden Chamber Invasion Assay
Assays were done in modified Boyden chambers (BD
Biosciences) as previously described (4). Cells at 1.5 10
4
per well were added to the upper chamber in 500 AL of
serum-free medium supplemented with insulin (5 Ag/mL).
The lower chamber was filled with 500 AL of conditioned
medium from fibroblasts. After a 20-h incubation, cells
were fixed and stained as previously described (4). Cells
that remained in the Matrigel or attached to the upper side
of the filter were removed with cotton tips. Invasive breast
cancer cells on the lower side of the filter were counted
using a light microscope.
QuantitativeWestern Analysis
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted on Immobilon membrane, and probed with anti – Id-1 and the
appropriate secondary antibody as previously described
(4, 13). Band intensity values were obtained directly from the
blot using AlphaeaseFC software or from film using Image-J
(NIH). As a normalization control for loading, blots were
stripped and reprobed with mouse alpha-tubulin (Abcam).
PCR
Total cellular RNA was isolated from breast cancer
cells treated with vehicle control or with CBD. Transcripts
for Id-1 and for h-actin were reverse-transcribed using
Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase II (Life Technologies),
and PCR was done. The 5¶ and 3¶ PCR primers were
AGGTGGTGCGCTGTCTGTCT and TAATTCCTCTTGCCCCCTGG for Id-1; and GCGGGAAATCGTGCGTGACATT
and GATGGAGTTGAAGGTAGTTTCGTG for h-actin.
PCR was done in buffer containing 1 Amol/L of each of
the 5¶ and 3¶ PCR primers and 0.5 units of Taq polymerase
using 25 cycles for amplification of Id-1 and h-actin cDNAs.
The cycle conditions were 45 s denaturation at 94jC, 45 s
annealing at 55jC, and 1 min extension at 72jC.
Id-1Promoter Reporter Assays
A SacI-BspHI fragment of 2.2 kb corresponding to the
5¶ upstream region of human Id-1 gene and driving a
luciferase gene in a PGL-3 vector (Promega) has already
been described (Id-1-sbsluc; ref. 13). Cells were plated in
six-well dishes in medium supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum and 5 Ag/mL insulin. After 24 h, cells were
cotransfected with 6 Ag of luciferase reporter plasmids and
2 Ag of pCMVh (Clontech) using Superfect reagent
(Qiagen). pCMVh contained bacterial h-galactosidase and
served to control for variation in transfection efficiency.
Three hours after transfection, the cells were rinsed twice
with PBS and were cultured in the absence or presence
of CBD for 48 to 72h. Cell pellets were lysed in 80 AL of
reporter lysis buffer (Promega) for 10 min at room temperature. Lysed cells were centrifuged and supernatants
harvested. Luciferase and h-gal assays were done using
Luciferase assay system (Promega), h-Gal assay kit (Clontech), and a 2010 luminometer (PharMingen).
Statistical Analysis
The IC50 values with corresponding 95% confidence
limits were compared by analysis of logged data (GraphPad Prism). When only the confidence limits of the IC50
Table 1. Antiproliferative potencies of cannabinoids during a
3-d treatment of MDA-MB231 and MDA-MB436 breast cancer
cells
Compound MDA-MB231 MDA-MB436
O
H3
C
H3
C
OH
CH3
CH3
D9
-THC 1.2(1.0 – 1.4) 2.5 (1.8 – 3.4)
H3
C
H3
C
OH
CH3
O CH3
CBN 1.2(0.9 – 1.5) 2.6 (1.8 – 3.7)
N CH3
O
O
N(CH2
CH2
)
2
0
WIN55,212-2 1.7 (1.5 – 2.2) 2.4 (1.6 – 3.4)
H3
C
OH
OH
OH
CH3
CH3
CP55,940 2.5 (1.5 – 4.1) 1.3 (0.7 – 1.6)
H3
C
H2
C
OH
HO CH3
CH3
CBD 1.3 (1.0 – 1.9) 1.6 (1.1 – 2.2)
H3C
CH3
CH3
HO
OH
CH3
CBG 2.3 (2.1 – 2.5) 2.1 (1.5 – 3.0)
NOTE: Cells were treated with cannabinoid compounds for 3 d and the
IC50 values for the antiproliferative effects of the compounds were
calculated. Data are the means and corresponding 95% confidence limits
of at least three experiments. IC50 values are reported in Amol/L.
2922 Cannabidiol and Id-1 in Breast Cancer
Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(11). November 2007values overlapped, significant differences were determined
using unpaired Student’s t test. Significant differences were
also determined (Prism) using ANOVA or the unpaired
Student’s t test, where suitable. Bonferroni-Dunn post
hoc analyses were conducted when appropriate. P < 0.05
values defined statistical significance.
Results
Cannabinoids Reduce the Growth of Aggressive Human Breast Cancer Cells
In order to test their antiproliferative activities, three
groups of cannabinoid compounds were chosen: (a)
natural cannabis constituents that have affinity for CB1
and CB2
receptors, D
9
-THC and CBN; (b) synthetic
cannabinoid analogues that have high affinity for CB1
and CB2 receptors, WIN55,212-2 and CP55,940; and (c)
natural cannabis constituents that do not have appreciable affinity for CB1 and CB2 receptors, CBD and CBG.
Breast cancer cells were treated for 3 days and IC50
values were calculated (Table 1). The rank order of
potencies for the antiproliferative effects of the cannabinoids in MDA-MB231 cells was: CBD = D
9
-THC = CBN >
WIN55,212-2 > CBG = CP55,940. The rank order of
potencies for the antiproliferative effects of the cannabinoids in MDA-MB436 cells was: CBD = CP55,940 > CBG =
WIN55,212-2 = D
9
-THC = CBN. Overall, the data showed
that CBD was the most effective inhibitor of human breast
cancer cell proliferation.
Cannabinoids Reduce Breast Cancer Cell Invasiveness
Invasion is an important step towards breast cancer
cell metastasis. Therefore, we next determined the effects of
several cannabinoids on the ability of the most aggressive
human breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB231, to migrate and
invade a reconstituted basement membrane in a Boyden
chamber. All three compounds tested, i.e., CBD, D
9
-THC,
and WIN55,212-2, significantly reduced the invasion of
MDA-MB231 cells (Fig. 1A). Again, as was observed with
the cell proliferation experiments, the most potent inhibitor
of invasion was CBD.
Figure 1. CBD is the most effective inhibitor of invasiveness and Id-1 expression in MDA-MD231 cells. A, the Boyden chamber invasion assay was used
to determine the effects of cannabinoids on the invasiveness of aggressive human breast cancer MDA-MB231 cells. Compounds were added at
concentrations of 0.1, 1.0, or 1.5 Amol/L. Data are presented as relative invasiveness of the cells through the Matrigel, where the respective controls are
set as 100%. B, proteins from MDA-MB231 cells treated with vehicle (control), 0.1, 1.0, or 1.5 Amol/L of CBD for 3 d were extracted and analyzed for
Id-1 by Western blot analysis as described in Materials and Methods. C, proteins from MDA-MB231 cells treated with additional cannabinoids for 3 d
were extracted and analyzed for Id-1 by Western blot analysis. Normalization was carried out by stripping the blots and reprobing with a monoclonal
antitubulin antibody. Densitometry readings of the blots were taken and the percentage of relative expression was calculated as the expression of Id-1 in
the treated cells / vehicle cells 100. D, the inhibitory effect of 1.5 Amol/L of CBD on Id-1 expression was compared over a time course of 1, 2, and 3 d.
Columns, mean of at least three replicates; bars, SE. Data were compared using a one-way ANOVA with a corresponding Dunnett’s post hoc test.
*, P < 0.05, statistically significant differences from control.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2923
Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(11). November 2007CBD Down-regulates Id-1Expression
We predicted that CBD, the most potent inhibitor of
breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion tested, would
regulate the expression of key genes that control breast
cancer cell proliferation and invasiveness. A potential
candidate protein that could mediate the effects of CBD
on both phenotypes was the helix-loop-helix protein Id-1.
We determined that treatment of MDA-MB231 cells with
CBD led to a concentration-dependent inhibition of Id-1
protein expression (Fig. 1B and C). The inhibitory effect of
CBD on Id-1 expression occurred at concentrations as low
as 100 nmol/L. CBD was significantly more effective at
reducing Id-1 protein expression compared with other cannabinoid compounds (Fig. 1C). The CBD concentrations
effective at inhibiting Id-1 expression correlated with those
used to inhibit the proliferative and invasive phenotype of
MDA-MB231 cells. Furthermore, the down-regulation of
Id-1 protein in the presence of CBD seemed to precede,
and not follow, the inhibitory effects of CBD on the
proliferation and invasiveness of MDA-MB231 cells
(Fig. 1D), suggesting that Id-1 down-regulation represents
a cause rather than a consequence of a decrease in breast
cancer cell aggressiveness.
The Effects of CBD on Invasion and Id-1 Protein Expression Can Be Reproduced in an Additional Breast
Cancer Cell Line
Based on the data presented in Table 1, CBD could also
decrease cell proliferation in another breast cancer cell
line other than MDA-MB231, the MDA-MB436 cells. The
metastatic cell line MDA-MB436 is able to invade
through the peritoneum and colonize visceral organs
when injected in athymic nude mice (14). However, these
cells are less metastatic than the MDA-MB231 cell line.
Using the MDA-MB436 cells, we confirmed the effects of
CBD on a decrease of cell invasion (Fig. 2A) associated
with a down-regulation of Id-1 protein expression
(Fig. 2B and C). These data suggest that the effects of
CBD on breast cancer cell phenotypes, potentially
through a decrease in Id-1 expression, are not restricted
to one particular cell line but could represent a more
general phenomenon.
CBD Inhibits theTranscription of the Id-1Gene
In order to determine if CBD modulated Id-1 at the
gene expression level, we investigated if Id-1 mRNA
was down-regulated by CBD. As shown in Fig. 3A using
reverse transcription-PCR, Id-1 mRNA expression was
significantly reduced upon treatment with CBD in MDAMB231 cells. To determine if this effect was due to the
inhibition of transcription, a construct was used that
contained the Id-1 promoter fused to a luciferase reporter
in a PGL-3 basic vector. This construct was transiently
transfected, and 24 h after transfection, MDA-MB231-Id-
1-luc cells were treated with CBD for 2or 3 days and
luciferase activity was measured. Transfection efficiency
and analysis of equal amounts of total protein were
controlled by cotransfection of the cells with pCMVB
containing h-galactosidase. Treatment with CBD resulted
in a significant inhibition of luciferase activity, with the
greatest inhibition occurring on day 3 (Fig. 3B and C).
The effect on the down-regulation of Id-1 mRNA and
promoter expression could also be reproduced in the
MDA-MB436 cell line (Fig. 3D and E). Overall, all these
findings correlated with the inhibition of Id-1 expression
as assessed by Western analysis.
CBD Does Not Inhibit Cell Invasiveness in Cells that
Ectopically Express Id-1
To determine if Id-1 represented a key mediator of
CBD effects in highly aggressive breast cancer cells, Id-1
was constitutively expressed into MDA-MB231 cells (+Id-
1 as described in Fig. 4). The ectopic Id-1 gene, which is
not under the control of the endogenous promoter, was
introduced in the cells using the pLXSN retroviral vector.
Figure 2. CBD reduces invasion as well as Id-1 expression in MDA-MD436 cells. A, the Boyden chamber invasion assay was used to determine the
effects of CBD on the invasiveness of human breast cancer MDA-MB436 cells. Data are presented as relative invasiveness of the cells through the Matrigel,
where the respective controls are set as 100%. B, proteins from MDA-MB436 cells treated with vehicle (control) or 2.0 Amol/L of CBD for 3 d were
extracted and analyzed for Id-1 by Western blot analysis. Normalization was carried out by stripping the blots and reprobing with a monoclonal antitubulin
antibody. C, densitometry readings of the blots were taken from three independent experiments and the percentage of relative expression was calculated
as the expression of Id-1 in the treated cells / vehicle cells 100. *, P < 0.05, statistically significant differences from control.
2924 Cannabidiol and Id-1 in Breast Cancer
Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(11). November 2007As a control, cells were infected with an empty pLXSN
vector ( Id-1). Ectopic Id-1 expression increased invasion
in MDA-MB231 cells in agreement with our previous
studies (13, 15). However, the difference in invasion
between cells that ectopically expressed Id-1, or the
control vector lacking Id-1, was not reflected in Fig. 3A
because the data was represented as relative invasiveness
(with all the control cells set at 100%). In cells expressing
the control vector, treatment with CBD led to a significant reduction in cell invasiveness (Fig. 4A). Western
blotting confirmed the down-regulation of Id-1 expression in this cell population (Fig. 4B). Importantly, and in
contrast with the results in control cells, CBD did not
inhibit cell invasiveness (Fig. 4A) or Id-1 expression
(Fig. 4B) in MDA-MB231+Id-1 cells that ectopically
expressed Id-1.
Discussion
Metastasis is the final and fatal step in the progression of
breast cancer. Currently available therapeutic strategies at
this stage of cancer progression are often nonspecific, have
only marginal efficacy, and are highly toxic. This is in part
due to the lack of knowledge about the molecular mechanisms regulating the development of aggressive cancers.
Therapeutic approaches targeting only specific mechanisms involved in the development of aggressive breast
cancers are urgently need. The expectation would be that
this strategy would reduce unwanted toxicities associated
with the therapy itself.
We previously showed that the helix-loop-helix protein
Id-1, an inhibitor of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, plays a crucial role during breast cancer progression
(4). Id-1 stimulated proliferation, migration, and invasion
in breast cancer cells (13, 16). Moreover, targeting Id-1
expression partially in breast cancer cells reduced invasion
in vitro and breast cancer metastasis in preclinical animal
models (4, 5). Based on these data, we hypothesized that
Id-1 could be a promising candidate for future therapy
approaches, and that inhibiting Id-1 expression and/or
activity might be of benefit for patients with breast cancer. This approach may be highly effective and safe in
advanced breast cancer patients, given (a) the relationship
between high Id-1 expression levels and aggressive breast
Figure 3. CBD inhibits the expression of Id-1 gene at the mRNA and promoter levels in MDA-MB231 and MDA-MB436 cells. A, the inhibition of the Id-1
gene product (434 bp) by CBD was investigated in MDA-MB231 cells using reverse transcription-PCR. Expression of the h-actin gene product (232 bp) was
used as a control. B, luciferase activity in MDA-MB231 cells transiently transfected with Id-1-sbsluc was determined in the presence of vehicle (control) or
1.5 Amol/L of CBD. Cells were treated for 2 d and luciferase activity was measured. C, cells were treated for 3 d. For both B and C, all values were
normalized for the amount of h-gal activity present in the cell extracts. Columns, mean of at least three replicates; bars, SE. The data are represented as
percentage of activity of the treated cells / vehicle cells 100. Data were compared using the unpaired Student’s t test. *, P < 0.05, statistically
significant differences from control. D, the inhibition of the Id-1 gene product by CBD was investigated in MDA-MB436 cells using reverse transcriptionPCR. Expression of the h-actin gene product was used as a control. E, luciferase activity in MDA-MB436 cells transiently transfected with Id-1-sbsluc was
determined in the presence of vehicle (control) or 2 Amol/L of CBD. Cells were treated for 2 d and luciferase activity was measured.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2925
Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(11). November 2007cancer cell behaviors; (b) partial reduction in Id-1 activity
can achieve significant outcomes; and (c) Id-1 expression is
low in normal adult tissues, thereby eliminating unwanted
toxicities generally associated with currently available therapeutic modalities.
However, approaches targeting Id-1 expression, including gene therapy using antisense oligonucleotide, short
interfering RNA, and nonviral or viral plasmid – based
strategies, are not yet routinely used in the clinic. Therefore,
the development of new strategies to modulate Id-1
expression/functional activity is needed. A range of small
molecules that target the molecular pathology of cancer are
now being developed, and a significant number of them are
being tested in ongoing human clinical trials (17). We
propose that the use of CBD, as an inhibitor of Id-1,
represents a novel strategy to treat breast cancer. A wide
range of cannabinoid compounds were tested and CBD,
a nonpsychoactive cannabinoid constituent, was the most
potent inhibitor of human breast cancer cell aggressiveness
through Id-1 mRNA and protein down-regulation.
Cannabinoid agonists working through CB1 and CB2
receptors have been shown to act as tumor inhibitors in a
variety of cancer models (7, 8). Present evidence also shows
that the cannabinoid constituent CBD, which has negligible
affinity for CB1 and CB2 receptors, also has antitumor
activity (18 – 20). Specifically, Ligresti et al. have recently
shown that CBD inhibits the metastasis of aggressive
human breast cancer cancers in vivo (11). However, the
primary molecular pathways involved in CBD inhibition of
invasion and metastasis remain to be clarified. Overall, the
IC50 values, even being within the range observed by other
laboratories (21, 22), were lower than those reported by
Ligresti et al. (11). This difference is likely due to the fact
that we did the experiments in lower serum concentrations,
which have been shown to improve the antiproliferative
activity of cannabinoids (23).
Here, we report that CBD acting as a potent Id-1 inhibitor
might effectively inhibit genotypic and phenotypic changes
that allow aggressive breast cancers to invade and metastasize. Most importantly, ectopic expression of Id-1 in MDAMB231 breast cancer cells abolished the effects of CBD on cell
invasion. Cells were infected with an Id-1 gene (pLXSN
vector) that is not under the control of the endogenous Id-1
promoter. As presented in Fig. 3, CBD seems to act by downregulating endogenous Id-1 gene expression at the promoter
level, not as a result of mRNA and/or protein destabilization. Therefore, CBD should not have any effect on the Id-1
expression from the pLXSN vector. Indeed, ectopic expression of Id-1 in MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells was able to
abolish the effects of CBD.
These data indicate that Id-1 is a key factor whose
expression needs to be down-regulated in order to observe
the beneficial effects of CBD on the reduction of breast
cancer cell aggressiveness. Based on previous findings
(reviewed in ref. 15), we suggest that a decrease in Id-1
protein upon CBD treatment might consequently lead to a
down-regulation of growth-promoting genes such as
Zfp289 as well as to a down-regulation of invasionpromoting genes such as the membrane type matrix
metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP).
Plant cannabinoids are stable compounds with lowtoxicity profiles that are well tolerated by animals and
humans during chronic administration (24, 25). A formulation including a 1:1 ratio of THC and CBD has recently
been used in a clinical trial for the treatment of multiple
sclerosis (26). The few side effects reported were related to
the psychoactivity of D
9
-THC. If CBD shows efficacy for
treatment of metastatic breast cancer in humans, the low
toxicity of the compound would make it an ideal candidate
for chronic administration.
Because CBD inhibits Id-1 expression in aggressive
breast cancer cells, a rational drug design strategy could
be used to potentially create more potent and efficacious
analogues. Moreover, reducing Id-1 expression with
cannabinoids could also provide a therapeutic strategy
for the treatment of additional aggressive cancers because
Id-1 expression was found to be up-regulated during
the progression of almost all types of solid tumors
investigated (27).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Mary Abood for helpful scientific discussions and
the critical reading of the manuscript.
Figure 4. Ectopic expression of Id-1 blocks the effect of CBD on MDAMB231 invasiveness. A, data are presented as relative invasiveness of
control MDA-MB231 cells ( Id-1) and of MDA-MB231 cells that
ectopically expressed Id-1 (+Id-1) after a 2-d treatment with vehicle
(control) or 1.5 Amol/L of CBD (CBD), and then an overnight invasion
assay. The respective controls are set as 100%; columns, mean of at
least three replicates; bars, SE. Data were compared using the unpaired
Student’s t test. *, P < 0.05, statistically significant differences from
control. B, the inhibitory effect of CBD on Id-1 expression in Id-1 and
+Id-1 MDA-MB231 cells was compared using Western analysis. Equal
loading was confirmed by stripping the blots and reprobing with a
monoclonal antitubulin antibody.
2926 Cannabidiol and Id-1 in Breast Cancer
Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(11). November 2007References
1. Braun S, Harbeck N. Molecular markers of metastasis in breast cancer:
current understanding and prospects for novel diagnosis and prevention.
Expert Rev Mol Med 2001;3:1 – 14.
2. Benezra R, Davis RL, Lockshon D, Turner DL, Weintraub H. The protein
Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins. Cell
1990;61:49 – 59.
3. Perk J, Iavarone A, Benezra R. Id family of helix-loop-helix proteins in
cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:603 – 14.
4. Fong S, Itahana Y, Sumida T, et al. Id-1 as a molecular target in therapy
for breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003;100:13543 – 8.
5. Minn AJ, Gupta GP, Siegel PM, et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer
metastasis to lung. Nature 2005;436:518– 24.
6. Pertwee RG. Pharmacology of cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors.
Pharmacol Ther 1997;74:129 – 80.
7. Bifulco M, Di Marzo V. Targeting the endocannabinoid system in
cancer therapy: a call for further research. Nat Med 2002;8:547 – 50.
8. Guzman M. Cannabinoids: potential anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer
2003;3:745 – 55.
9. McPartland JM, Russo EB. Cannabis and cannabis extract: greater than
the sum of the parts? J Cannabis Ther 2001;1:103 – 32.
10. Showalter VM, Compton DR, Martin BR, Abood ME. Evaluation of
binding in a transfected cell line expressing a peripheral cannabinoid
receptor (CB2): identification of cannabinoid receptor subtype selective
ligands. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996;278:989 – 99.
11. Ligresti A, Moriello AS, Starowicz K, et al. Antitumor activity of plant
cannabinoids with emphasis on the effect of cannabidiol on human breast
carcinoma. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006;318:1375 – 87.
12. McAllister SD, Chan C, Taft RJ, et al. Cannabinoids selectively inhibit
proliferation and induce death of cultured human glioblastoma multiforme
cells. J Neurooncol 2005;74:31 – 40.
13. Lin CQ, Singh J, Murata K, et al. A role for Id-1 in the aggressive
phenotype and steroid hormone response of human breast cancer cells.
Cancer Res 2000;60:1332 – 40.
14. Thompson EW, Paik S, Brunner N, et al. Association of increased
basement membrane invasiveness with absence of estrogen receptor and
expression of vimentin in human breast cancer cell lines. J Cell Physiol
1992;150:534 – 44.
15. Fong S, Debs RJ, Desprez PY. Id genes and proteins as promising
targets in cancer therapy. Trends Mol Med 2004;10:387 – 92.
16. Desprez PY, Lin CQ, Thomasset N, Sympson CJ, Bissell MJ, Campisi
J. A novel pathway for mammary epithelial cell invasion induced by the
helix-loop-helix protein Id-1. Mol Cell Biol 1998;18:4577 – 88.
17. Pagliaro L, Felding J, Audouze K, et al. Emerging classes of proteinprotein interaction inhibitors and new tools for their development. Curr
Opin Chem Biol 2004;8:442 – 9.
18. Kogan NM, Rabinowitz R, Levi P, et al. Synthesis and antitumor activity
of quinonoid derivatives of cannabinoids. J Med Chem 2004;47:3800 – 6.
19. Massi P, Vaccani A, Ceruti S, Colombo A, Abbracchio MP, Parolaro D.
Antitumor effects of cannabidiol, a nonpsychoactive cannabinoid, on
human glioma cell lines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004;308:838 – 45.
20. McKallip RJ, Jia W, Schlomer J, Warren JW, Nagarkatti PS,
Nagarkatti M. Cannabidiol-induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells: a
novel role of cannabidiol in the regulation of p22phox and Nox4
expression. Mol Pharmacol 2006;70:897 – 908.
21. Galve-Roperh I, Sanchez C, Cortes ML, del Pulgar TG, Izquierdo M,
Guzman M. Anti-tumoral action of cannabinoids: involvement of sustained
ceramide accumulation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Nat Med 2000;6:313 – 9.
22. Sanchez C, Galve-Roperh I, Canova C, Brachet P, Guzman M. D9-
Tetrahydrocannabinol induces apoptosis in C6 glioma cells. FEBS Lett
1998;436:6 – 10.
23. Jacobsson SO, Rongard E, Stridh M, Tiger G, Fowler CJ. Serumdependent effects of tamoxifen and cannabinoids upon C6 glioma cell
viability. Biochem Pharmacol 2000;60:1807 – 13.
24. Chandrasekaran R, McAllister SD, Patel SD, Moore DH, Abood ME.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: delayed disease progression in mice by
treatment with a cannabinoid. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor
Neuron Disord 2004;5:33 – 9.
25. Russo E, Grotenhermen F. Cannabis and cannabinoids: pharmacology, toxicology, and therapeutic potential. The Hawthorne Integrative
Healing Press; 2002.
26. Wade DT, Makela P, Robson P, House H, Bateman C. Do cannabisbased medicinal extracts have general or specific effects on symptoms in
multiple sclerosis? A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
on 160 patients. Mult Scler 2004;10:434 – 41.
27. Ling MT, Wang X, Zhang X, Wong YC. The multiple roles of Id-1 in
cancer progression. Differentiation 2006;74:481 – 7.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2927
Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6(11). November 2007

Cannabinoids 2006;1(1):10-14 10 © International Association for Cannabis as Medicine


Cannabinoids 2006;1(1):10-14 10  © International Association for Cannabis as Medicine

Mini-review 
Cannabinoids and the Endocannabinoid System  
Franjo Grotenhermen 
nova-Institut, Goldenbergstraße 2, D-50354 Hürth, Germany 
Abstract 
The human body possesses specific binding sites on the surface of many cell types for cannabinoids, and our body produces several endocannabinoids, fatty acid derivatives that bind to these 
cannabinoid receptors (CB) and activate them. CB receptors and endocannabinoids together constitute the endocannabinoid system. Some phytocannabinoids, cannabinoids of the cannabis plant, 
and a multitude of synthetic cannabinoids produced in the laboratory mimic the effects of endocannabinoids. '
9
-THC (dronabinol), the pharmacologically most active cannabinoid of the cannabis plant, binds to both types of cannabinoid receptors that have been identified so far, the CB1 and 
the CB2 receptor. These receptors have been found in the central nervous system (brain and spinal 
cord) and many peripheral tissues and organs. Depending on the kind of cells, on dose and state of 
the body, activation of CB receptors may cause a multitude of effects including euphoria, anxiety, 
dry mouth, muscle relaxation, hunger and pain reduction. Besides activation of CB receptors several other approaches are under investigation to influence the cannabinoid system with therapeutic 
intent, including blockade of CB receptors (antagonism) and modulation of endocannabinoid concentrations by inhibition of their degradation. Currently, several preparations that stimulate cannabinoid receptors (dronabinol, nabilone and cannabis) and one compound that blocks the CB1 receptor (rimonabant) are used medicinally. 
Keywords: Cannabis, THC, cannabinoid, cannabinoid receptor, endocannabinoid, therapeutic use. 
This article can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is properly cited (see copyright info below). Available online at www.cannabis-med.org 
Author's address: Franjo Grotenhermen, franjo-grotenhermen@nova-institut.de 
Introduction 
'
9
-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is thought to be the 
pharmacologically most active cannabinoid of the 
cannabis plant and its products marijuana (cannabis 
herb) and hashish (cannabis resin). The majority of 
THC effects are mediated through agonistic actions at 
cannabinoid receptors of the human or animal body. 
Agonistic action means that receptors are activated in 
contrast to antagonistic action, i.e. blockade of receptor 
effects.  
Cannabinoid receptors and endocannabinoids, compounds produced by the body that bind to these receptors, together constitute the endocannabinoid system. 
This system is of great importance for the normal function of the body and is millions of years old. It has been 
found in mammals, birds, amphibians, fish, sea urchins, molluscs and leeches. The mechanism of action 
of cannabinoids is best investigated for THC and other 
cannabinoids that bind to known cannabinoid receptors, while the mode of action of other cannabinoids of 
therapeutic interest, among them cannabidiol (CBD), is 
less well established. 
Extended reviews on the issues presented in this short 
article are available at [2,4,5,7,9]. Additional and upto-date information is available from the IACM-Bulletin [8].  
Cannabinoids
Cannabinoids were originally regarded as any of a 
class of typical C21 groups of compounds present in 
Cannabis sativa L.. The modern definition is termed 
with more emphasis on synthetic chemistry and on 
pharmacology, and encompasses kindred structures, or 
any other compound that affects cannabinoid receptors. Grotenhermen 
Cannabinoids Œ Vol 1, No 1 Œ September 17, 2006  11  
O
OH
O
OH
9
8
3
4
5
6
6'
5'
4'
3'
2'
1'
1
3
2
7
3' 5
10b
10
1'
11
9
8
7
13
12
6a
6 5
4
2
1
Monoterpenoid numbering  Dibenzopyran numbering
10
1" 3" 5"
10a
Figure 1. Chemical structure of 
THC (dronabinol), the main 
cannabinoid in the cannabis 
plant, according to the monoterpenoid system ('
1
-THC) and 
dibenzopyran system ('
9
-THC).
This has created several chemical sub-categories that 
take into consideration the various forms of natural and 
synthetic compounds. 
It has been proposed to use the term phytocannabinoid 
for the natural plant compounds and endocannabinoids 
for the natural animal compounds, the endogenous 
ligands of the cannabinoid receptors. Synthetic agonists 
of these receptors have been classified according to 
their degree of kinship (e.g. "classical" vs. "non-classical") with phytocannabinoids.  
Natural plant cannabinoids are oxygen-containing 
aromatic hydrocarbons. In contrast to most other drugs, 
including opiates, cocaine, nicotine and caffeine, they 
do not contain nitrogen, and hence are not alkaloids. 
Phytocannabinoids were originally thought to be only 
present in the cannabis plant (Cannabis sativa L.), but 
recently some cannabinoid type bibenzyls have also 
been found in liverwort (Radula perrottetii and Radula 
marginata). 
More than 60 cannabinoids have been detected in cannabis, mainly belonging to one of 10 subclasses or 
types [3], of whom the cannabigerol type (CBG), the 
cannabichromene type (CBC), the cannabidiol type 
(CBD), the  '
9
-THC type, and the cannabinol type 
(CBN) are the most abundant. Cannabinoid distribution 
varies between different cannabis strains and usually 
only three or four cannabinoids are found in one plant 
in concentrations above 0.1%.  '
9
-THC is largely responsible for the pharmacological effects of cannabis 
including its psychoactive properties, though other 
compounds of the cannabis plant also contribute to 
some of these effects,  especially CBD, a non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid common in some cannabis 
strains that has anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti-anxiety and anti-psychotic effects. 
11-OH-'
9
-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-OH-THC) is the 
most important psychotropic metabolite of  '
9
-THC 
with a similar spectrum of actions and similar kinetic 
profiles as the parent molecule. 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC 
(THC-COOH) is the most important non-psychotropic 
metabolite of '
9
-THC. 
Cannabinoid Receptors
To date two cannabinoid receptors have been identified, the CB1, and the CB2  receptor.  They  differ  in 
signaling mechanisms and tissue distribution. Activation of cannabinoid receptors causes inhibition of adenylat cyclase, thus inhibiting the conversion of ATP to 
cyclic AMP (cAMP). Other mechanisms have also 
been observed, e.g. interaction with certain ion channels. 
Both CB1 and CB2 receptors belong to the large family 
of the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). GPCRs 
are the most common receptors, containing 1000-2000 
members in vertebrates. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are 
among the most abundant and widely distributed 
GPCRs in the brain. 
Activation of the CB1  receptor  produces  effects  on 
circulation and psyche common to cannabis ingestion, 
while activation of the CB2  receptor  does  not.  CB1
receptors are mainly found on nerve cells in the brain, 
spinal cord and peripheral nervous system, but are also 
present in certain peripheral organs and tissues, among 
them endocrine glands, salivary glands, leukocytes, 
spleen, heart and parts of the reproductive, urinary and 
gastrointestinal tracts. Many CB1 receptors are expressed at the terminals of central and peripheral 
nerves and inhibit the release of other neurotransmitters. Thus, CB1 receptor activation protects the nervous 
system from over-activation or over-inhibition by neurotransmitters. CB1  receptors  are  highly  expressed  in 
regions of the brain, which are responsible for movement (basal ganglia, cerebellum), memory processing 
(hippocampus, cerebral cortex) and pain modulation 
(certain parts of the spinal  cord, periaqueductal grey), 
while their expression in the brainstem is low, which 
may account for the lack of cannabis-related acute 
fatalities. The brainstem controls, among others, respiration and circulation.  
CB2  receptors  occur  principally  in  immune  cells, 
among them leukocytes, spleen and tonsils. One of the 
functions of CB receptors in the immune system is 

O
OH
Figure 2. Cannabidiol Mini-review 
12  Cannabinoids Œ Vol 1, No 1 Œ September 17, 2006 
N
O
H OH
Figure 3. Arachidonoylethanolamide (AEA, anandamide) 
O
O
OH
CH2
OH
Figure 4. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) 
modulation of release of cytokines, which are responsible for inflammation and regulation of the immune 
system. Since compounds that selectively activate CB2
receptors (CB2  receptor  agonists)  do  not  cause  psychological effects, they have become an increasingly 
investigated target for therapeutic uses of cannabinoids, 
among them analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anticancer actions.  
There is increasing evidence for the existence of additional cannabinoid receptor subtypes in the brain and 
periphery. One of these receptors may be the orphan Gprotein-coupled receptor GPR55 [1]. Other receptors 
may be only functionally related to the known cannabinoid receptors than have a similar structure as CB1
and CB2.  
Endocannabinoids 
The identification of cannabinoid receptors was followed by the detection of endogenous ligands for these 
receptors, named endocannabinoids. In the brain endocannabinoids serve as neuromodulators. All endocannabinoids are derivatives of polyunsaturated fatty acids, thus differing in chemical structure from phytocannabinoids of the cannabis plant. Among the endocannabinoids so far identified are anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamide, AEA), 2-arachidonoylglycerol 
(2-AG), 2-arachidonylglyceryl ether (noladin ether), Oarachidonoyl-ethanolamine (virodhamine), and N-arachidonoyl-dopamine (NADA). Anandamide and 
NADA do not only bind to cannabinoid receptors but 
also share the ability of capsaicin, a constituent of hot 
chilli peppers, to stimulate vanilloid (TRPV1) receptors. 
The first two discovered endocannabinoids, anandamide and 2-AG, have been most studied. In contrast 
to other brain chemical signals they are not produced 
and stored in the nerve cells but produced `on demanda 
(only when necessary) from their precursors and then 
released from cells. After release, they are rapidly  
deactivated by uptake into cells and metabolized. Metabolism of anandamide and 2-AG occurs mainly by 
enzymatic hydrolysis by fatty acid amide hydrolase 
(FAAH) and monoacylglycerol lipase (2-AG only).  
Affinity for the Cannabinoid Receptor 
Cannabinoids show different affinity to CB1  and  CB2
receptors. Synthetic cannabinoids have been developed 
that act as highly selective  agonists or antagonists at 
one or other of these receptor types. '
9
-THC has approximately equal affinity for the CB1  and  CB2  receptor, while anandamide has marginal selectivity for 
CB1  receptors.  However,  the  efficacy  of  THC  and 
anandamide is less at CB2 than at CB1 receptors.  
Tonic Activity of the Endocannabinoid System 
When administered by themselves antagonists at the 
cannabinoid receptor may behave as inverse agonists in 
several bioassay systems. This means that they do not 
only block the effects of endocannabinoids but produce 
effects that are opposite  in direction from those produced by cannabinoid receptor agonists, e.g. cause 
increased sensitivity to pain or nausea, suggesting that 
the cannabinoid system is tonically active. This tonic 
activity may be due a constant release of endocannabinoids or from a portion of cannabinoid receptors that 
exist in a constitutively active state. 
Tonic activity of the cannabinoid system has been 
demonstrated in several conditions. Endocannabinoid 
levels have been demonstrated to be increased in a pain 
circuit of the brain (periaqueductal grey) following 
painful stimuli. Tonic control of spasticity by the endocannabinoid system has been observed in chronic relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis 
(CREAE) in mice, an animal model of multiple sclerosis. An increase of cannabinoid receptors following 
nerve damage was demonstrated in a rat model of 
chronic neuropathic pain and in a mouse model of 
intestinal inflammation. This may increase the potency 
of cannabinoid agonists used for the treatment of these 
conditions. Tonic activity has also been demonstrated 
with regard to appetite control and with regard to vomiting in emetic circuits of the brain. 
  
Therapeutic Prospects 
Mechanisms of action of cannabinoids are complex, 
not only involving activation of and interaction at the 
cannabinoid receptor, but also activation of vanilloid 
receptors, increase of endocannabinoid concentration, 
antioxidant activity, metabolic interaction with other 
compounds, and several others. CB receptor antagonists (blockers) are in clinical use for the treatment of 
obesity and under investigation for the treatment of 
nicotine and other dependencies. 
Aside from phytocannabinoids and cannabis preparations, cannabinoid analogues that do not or only 
weakly bind to the CB1  receptor  are  attractive  com- Grotenhermen 
Cannabinoids Œ Vol 1, No 1 Œ September 17, 2006  13
O
O
OH
Figure 5. Nabilone 

OH
COOH 
Figure 6. CT3 (ajulemic acid, IP751) 
OH
O
O
HOOC O
Figure 7. Cannabinor 
N
N
Cl
Cl
Cl
H-N
N
O
Figure 8. Rimonabant (SR 141716A), Aclompia® 
pounds for clinical research. Additional ideas for the 
separation of the desired therapeutic effects from the 
psychotropic action comprise the concurrent administration of THC and CBD, the design of CB1 receptor 
agonists that do not cross the blood brain barrier, and 
the development of compounds that influence endocannabinoid levels by inhibition of their membrane 
transport (transport inhibitors) or hydrolysis (e.g. 
FAAH inhibitors). For example, blockers of anandamide hydrolysis were able to reduce among others, 
anxiety, pain, cancer growth, and colitis in animal tests. 
Drugs that enhance the response of the CB1 receptor to 
endogenously released endocannabinoids by binding to 
the so-called allosteric site  on  this  receptor  are  also 
likely to be more selective than compounds that activate this receptor directly [10]. 
Modulators of the cannabinoid system in clinical 
use and under investigation 
Currently two cannabinoid receptor agonists, dronabinol and nabilone, a cannabis extract (Sativex®), and a 
cannabinoid receptor antagonist (rimonabant) are in 
medical use. In addition, cannabis herb produced according to pharmaceutical standards and supervised by 
the Office of Medicinal Cannabis of the Dutch Health 
Ministry is available in pharmacies of the Netherlands 
[4]. In some countries the possession of small amounts 
of cannabis either for recreational or medicinal use is 
allowed or tolerated, such as in the Netherlands, Spain, 
Belgium and some regions of Switzerland. Eleven 
states of the USA (Alaska,  California,  Colorado,  Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, 
Vermont, Washington) have legalized the medical use 
of cannabis under state law, while it remains illegal 
under federal law. In Canada it is possible to apply for 
a certificate of exemption to use otherwise illegal cannabis for medical purposes, and the Health Ministry 
(Health Canada) sells cannabis herb to these patients if 
they do not want to grow it themselves. 
Dronabinol is the international non-proprietary name 
(INN) for  '
9
-THC, the main psychoactive compound 
of cannabis. In 1985 the Food and Drug Administration 
(FDA) of the United States approved Marinol® Capsules, which contain synthetic dronabinol (2.5 mg, 5 
mg or 10 mg), for nausea and vomiting associated with 
cancer chemotherapy in patients that had failed to respond adequately to conventional anti-emetic treatments. Marinol® is manufactured by Unimed Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of  Solvay  Pharmaceuticals. 
Marinol® has been on the market in the USA since 
1987. In 1992 the FDA approved Marinol® Capsules 
for the treatment of anorexia  associated  with  weight 
loss in patients with AIDS. Marinol is also available on 
prescription in several other countries including Canada and several European countries. In Germany and 
Austria dronabinol, which is manufactured by the two 
German companies THC Pharm and Delta 9 Pharma, 
may be bought by pharmacies to produce dronabinol 
capsules or solutions. 
In 1985 the FDA also approved Cesamet® Capsules 
for the treatment of nausea  and  vomiting  associated 
with chemotherapy. Cesamet® made by Eli Lilly and 
Company contains nabilone, a synthetic derivative of 
dronabinol. However, it was not marketed in the USA 
and Lilly discontinued the drug in 1989. Cesamet® is 
also available in the United Kingdom marketed by Mini-review 
14  Cannabinoids Œ Vol 1, No 1 Œ September 17, 2006 
Cambridge Laboratories and in several other European 
countries. In 2006 nabilone (Cesamet®) again got 
approval by the FDA as a  prescription treatment for 
nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy. It 
is marketed by Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, 
which bought the drug from Eli Lilly in 2004 and also 
sells it in Canada. 
In 2005 Sativex® received approval in Canada for the 
symptomatic relief of neuropathic pain in multiple 
sclerosis. Sativex® is produced by the British company 
GW Pharmaceuticals and marketed in Canada by Bayer 
Health Care. Sativex® is a cannabis extract, which is 
sprayed in the oromucosal area and contains approximately equal amounts of dronabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). There is also limited access to Sativex® in the UK and Spain. Sativex is currently under 
review for approval as a prescription medication for 
treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis in the 
United Kingdom, Spain, Denmark and the Netherlands.  
The cannabinoid receptor antagonist rimonabant received a positive recommendation for approval by the 
European Medicines Agency in 2006. It is available in 
the United Kingdom under the trade name Acomplia® 
for the treatment of obesity. Acomplia® tablets contain 
20 mg of rimonabant. The drug is manufactured by 
Sanofi Aventis.  
Preparations under investigation in clinical phase II or 
III studies include the capsulated cannabis extract Cannador®, which contains dronabinol and other cannabinoids in a ratio of 2 to 1 and is being investigated by 
the Institute for Clinical Research in Berlin and the 
pharmaceutical company Weleda, ajulemic acid, a 
synthetic derivative of THC-COOH, which is also 
called CT3 or IP751 and is being investigated by Indevus Pharmaceuticals, and cannabinor, a synthetic cannabinoid that binds selectively to the CB2 receptor and 
is being investigated by Pharmos Corporation. 
References 
1. Baker D, Pryce G, Davies WL, Hiley CR. In 
silico patent searching reveals a new cannabinoid 
receptor. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2006;27(1):1-4. 
2. Di Marzo V, De Petrocellis L. Plant, synthetic, 
and endogenous cannabinoids in medicine. Annu 
Rev Med 2006;57:553-74. 
3. ElSohly M. Chemical constituents of cannabis. 
In: Grotenhermen F, Russo E, editors. Cannabis 
and cannabinoids. Pharmacology, toxicology, and 
therapeutic potential. Binghamton/New York: 
Haworth Press, 2002. p. 27-36. 
4. Grotenhermen F. Cannabinoids. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord 2005;4(5):507-530. 
5. Grotenhermen F. Clinical  pharmacodynamics  of 
cannabinoids. In: Russo E, Grotenhermen F, editors. The Handbook of Cannabis Therapeutics: 
From Bench to Bedside. Binghamton/New York: 
Haworth Press, 2006. p. 117-170.  
6. Hazekamp A. An evaluation of the quality of 
medicinal grade cannabis in the Netherlands. 
Cannabinoids 2006;1(1):1-9. 
7. Howlett AC, Barth F, Bonner TI, Cabral G, 
Casellas P, Devane WA, Felder CC, Herkenham 
M, Mackie K, Martin BR, Mechoulam R, 
Pertwee RG. International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors. Pharmacol Rev 2002;54(2):161-202. 
8. IACM-Bulletin. Bulletin of the International 
Association for Cannabis as Medicine. Available 
from: http://www.cannabismed.org/english/bulletin/iacm.php. 
9. Pertwee R. Receptors and pharmacodynamics: 
natural and synthetic cannabionoids and endocannabinoids. In: Guy GW, Whittle B, Robson P, 
editors. The Medicinal Uses of Cannabis and 
Cannabinoids. London, Chicago: Pharmaceutical 
Press; 2004. p. 103-139. 
10. Price MR, Baillie GL, Thomas A, Stevenson LA, 
Easson M, Goodwin R, McLean A, McIntosh L, 
Goodwin G, Walker G, Westwood P, Marrs J, 
Thomson F, Cowley P, Christopoulos A, Pertwee 
RG, Ross RA. Allosteric modulation of the cannabinoid CB1  receptor.  Mol  Pharmacol 
2005;68(5):1484-95.